Remote C-H Bond Functionalizations. Группа авторов

      Source: Modified from Wan et al. [18].

Despite the success of meta‐C–H arylation with arylboronic esters, meta‐C–H arylation using low‐cost aryl iodides proved to be challenging with the nitrile‐based templates. Most recently, Li and coworkers achieved the first example of meta‐C–H arylation of hydrocinnamic acid derivatives with aryl iodides assisted by the carboxyl‐based template (Scheme 2.9) [15]. Notably, the site‐selectivity is generally excellent with moderate to good yields. Moreover, aryl halides bearing an ortho‐electron‐withdrawing group (o‐EWG) such as a methyl ester group were found to be most suitable with the reaction, which is possibly because that the combined electronic as well as weak coordinating effect of the o‐EWG could facilitate oxidative addition with these aryl iodides.

Scheme 2.9 meta‐C–H arylation of hydrocinnamic acids with aryl iodides.

      Source: Modified from Li et al. [15].

      Finally, C–H deuteration and alkylation of hydrocinnamic acid derivatives were also possible using N‐based heteroarene‐containing templates, but only isolated examples were disclosed [19]. In short, the notable meta‐C–H activation hydrocinnamic acid derivatives includes olefination and arylation with Pd(II) or Rh(III) catalysts, using nitrile‐based or carboxyl‐based templates.

      2.2.2.2 Phenylacetic Acid Derivatives

The generality of the template strategy in accommodating potential macrocyclopalladation processes with smaller ring sizes was also investigated with phenylacetic acid derivatives. Notably, the Fujiwara–Moritani‐type olefination is often used as the effective model reaction to test feasibility of a new substrate design of meta‐C–H activation relation. In 2014, the Maiti group introduced a new category of nitrile‐based phenolic directing template, which is now available from Sigma Aldrich as the Maiti–Bera–Modak (MBM) auxiliary, for meta‐C–H olefination of phenylacetic acid derivatives via an ester linkage (Scheme 2.10) [20]. In this new class of substrates, a smaller 12‐membered cyclic transition state was proposed for the palladation step than hydrocinnamic acid derivatives. With this easily synthesized and removable 2‐hydroxybenzonitrile template, a broad range of phenylacetates were olefinated in a highly mono‐selective as well as meta‐selective fashion. Moreover, this protocol was also applied to drug molecules such as ibuprofen in a moderate yield and selectivity, products of which are difficult to access using conventional methods of diversification.

Scheme 2.10 meta‐C–H olefination of phenylacetate.

      Source: Modified from Bera et al. [20].

Simultaneously, Yu and coworker disclosed a protocol of the commercially available dibenzonitrile directing template assisted meta‐C–H olefination of phenylacetic acid derivatives via an amide linkage [21]. Notably, N‐formyl‐protected glycine (Formyl‐Gly‐OH) was identified as the new ligand for this new class of substrate. Unlike previous protocols, weak base KH₂PO₄ was required to use as the crucial additive. This reaction further demonstrates the good versatility of the template approach in accommodating potentially necessary macrocyclopalladation processes with different ring size for different classes of substrates (Scheme 2.11) [21].

Scheme 2.11 meta‐C–H olefination of phenylacetic acid derivatives. Source: Modified from Deng et al. [21].

In 2017, the Maiti group developed the first rhodium‐catalyzed meta‐C–H olefination of phenylacetic acid frameworks with the assistance of 2‐hydroxy‐4‐methoxy benzonitrile template (Scheme 2.12) [22]. The XPhos (2,4′,6′‐diisopropyl‐1,1′‐biphenyl‐2‐yldicyclohexylphosphine) was identified as the crucial ligand for this reaction. Substituents of phenylacetic acid esters at all positions of the arene ring were found to be tolerated. Synthetic application of this protocol was also expanded to the diversification of ketoprofen, a drug molecule containing a secondary α‐methyl substituent.

Scheme 2.12 Rh‐catalyzed meta‐C–H olefination of phenylacetic acid derivatives.

      Source: Modified from Bera et al. [22].

Besides nitrile‐based templates, N‐containing heteroarene‐based templates also proved to be applicable for the phenylacetic acid frameworks (Scheme 2.13) [23]. In 2017, Yu and coworkers reported the a Pd‐catalyzed meta‐C–H olefination of phenylacetic acid scaffolds using a pyridine‐based template via an amide linkage. A variety of phenylacetic acids, including cyclic and heterocyclic substrates, were efficiently meta‐C–H olefinated in HFIP solvent without using additional ligand, opening new avenues for potential utility in C–H functionalization of advanced intermediates and late‐stage modifications. Notably, the template could be used to extend the reaction scope to cross‐coupling and iodination reactions (vide infra).

Scheme 2.13 Pyridine‐based template assisted meta‐C–H olefination of phenylacetic acid derivatives.

      Source: Modified from Jin et al. [23].

A novel N‐containing pyrimidine‐based template was also utilized to enable meta‐C–H perfluoroalkenylation of phenylacetic acid derivatives by Werz, Zanoni, Maiti, and coworkers for the synthesis of organofluorine compounds (Scheme 2.14a) [24]. Notably, perfluoroalkenylation of drug molecule Ibuprofen was also possible with this protocol and the cleavage of the template is facile.

Scheme 2.14 (a) meta‐C‐H perfluoroalkenylation of phenylacetic acid derivatives. (b) meta‐C‐H alkenylation of phenylacetic acid derivatives with electron‐deficient coupling partners.

      Source: (a) Modified from Brochetta et al. [24]; (b) Modified from Jiao et al. [25].

      Meanwhile, Wang, Zhou, and