Monument Future. Siegfried Siegesmund

Caused by Human Beings / Vandalism R(V)

      8 Mechanical Damage / Loss of Material R(M)

      9 Surface Alteration R(SF)

      10 Ultrasonic Diagnosis R(US)

      11 Overall Risk Number R(total)

       Function of Data Sheets

      Content and purpose of the data sheets and the calculation of the Risk Number will be explained using the sculpture of Hera (original) in the Baroque garden, Großsedlitz near Dresden. Bullet impacts during World War II caused severe damages to the figure.

      Because of limitations of space, only one data sheet can be shown. The endogenous natural stone properties decisively determine the course of weathering due to mineral content, structure, and thermal as well as hygric expansion. The data sheet shown refers to the sandstone sculpture Hera/Juno in the Baroque Garden of Großsedlitz near Dresden. It can be seen how the different parameters are evaluated and in which way the Risk Number R(i) of the whole sheet is calculated.

      On the last data sheet “Overall Valuation” the Partial Risk Numbers are combined to assess the Overall Risk Number R(total). For this purpose, the Partial Risk Numbers R(i) of all data sheets except Nr. 1 (Object Description) and Nr. 2 (Art Historical Evaluation) are summed up and a mean value is formed:

      R(total) = [R(RH) + R(E) + R(N) + R(V) + R(M) + R(SF) + R(US)] / 7 = < 1

      Figure 1: Data Sheet for endogenous stone properties. Example Hera in the Baroque Garden of Großsedlitz.

      38Due to the mean value formation the Overall Risk Number R(total) is also a number between 0 and 1. Zero stands for no risk and one for a very high risk. This scaling gives an immediate indication of the degree of a risk for the sculpture under consideration. Again, it has to be emphasized that the Overall Risk Number R(i) is formed with objective and quantitative measurement values and is therefore free of any subjective evaluation. It is ideal for decision-making, especially for determining a ranking within a group of sculptures. Furthermore, in combination with the Overall Risk Number R(total) the Risk Numbers R(i) of the data sheets can indicate the areas of a sculpture at particular risk.

       Risk number: Evaluation and Comparisons

      For testing the concept of the Risk Number R(i), 12 objects have been selected, four statues of marble, four of sandstone and four sandstone tombstones from the Jewish Cemetery in Baiersdorf/Erlangen (see Figure 2).

      Figure 2: The objects chosen for testing the Risk Number.

      The Overall Risk Number R(total) in data sheet 11 of the Excel work sheet is automatically calculated. Although this data sheet lists both the arithmetic mean of the Risk Number and the quadratic mean, only the arithmetic is considered in the following because the overall statement remains the same even if the quadratic mean provides slightly different values.

      The individual Risk Number calculations of the 12 examined objects yielded surprising results in an initial, unbiased assessment, which, however, have proved to be very useful.

      The Overall Risk Numbers of the individual sculptures and tombstones are depicted in Figure 3.

      The object with the lowest Risk Number is tombstone No. 1901, the one with the highest is Vestalin. In addition, at the upper and lower ends of the scale the realistic maximum and minimum limits for marble and sandstone are presented. These limits indicate possible maximum and minimum overall Risk Numbers for these rock types. The range extents from 0.24 to 0.88 for marble and from 0.18 to 0.79 for sandstone. The reason for these limits lies in the fact that certain data sheets or parameters cannot reach a value like zero or one.

      For example, data sheet “Environment – Exogenous Risk Factors” could theoretically assume a value of 1 in the case of very extreme climate, but never a value of zero, because a “non-climate” does not exist. This also applies to data sheets “Natural Stone – Endogenous Risk Factors”. Even in a very favourable climate, thermal and hydric expansion and water absorption exert an influence on the weathering.

      Figure 3: Overall Risk Numbers of the selected objects.

      39The calculation system for the Overall Risk Number permits model calculations for open air exposure or location in a store. Relevant for this are the data sheets “Environment – Exogenous Risk Factors”, “Vandalism” and certain rock properties such as thermal and hygric expansion. These parameters vary according to the location of the sculpture. Comparisons have shown that the risk reduces by 0.22 to 0.25 for marble objects and 0.18 to 0.22 for sandstone objects when moving them from outdoors to a depot.

      Whatever the value of an object’s Risk Number, the question arises as to how large the numerical change regarding the Overall Risk Number must be in order to be able to draw a valid conclusion as to a greater or lesser overall risk. As we could see, the values of some sculptures are very close to each other, for example Aeolus (R(total) = 0.60) and Flora (R(total) = 0.59). The question is whether 0.01 points is significant or not. Simple considerations demonstrate that even small differences are important. Because, for calculating the Overall Risk Number R(total) the sum of the individual Risk Numbers R(i) is divided by seven so that even a small difference of 0.01 can be significant in one of the data sheets.

      More straightforward, three types of endangerments can be defined: “little endangered” – “endangered” – highly endangered”. These categories range approximately from 0.2 to 0.4, 0.4 to 0.6 and 0.6 and 0.8. Figure 4 shows that the marble sculptures Vestalin, Flora and Äolus are highly endangered.

       Conclusion

      This report has shown that the concept of the Risk Number accurately represents the degree of endangerment to outdoor sculptures. The difference often found between a visually subjective evaluation and the objectively calculated Risk Number initially led to the conclusion that the Risk Number would not accurately reflect the overall situation. The fact, however, that the Risk Numbers describe the conditions of environment and stone properties as they really are, means in consequence that the Risk Number values represent the risk of endangerment for the investigated sculptures objectively and realistically.

      Figure 4: Simplified categories for marble: “little endangered” – “endangered” – highly endangered”.

      Model calculations also permit a prediction about the decrease of the risk for a sculpture when moving it from an outdoor exposure to a depot. In these cases, the risk decreases by about 20 %, which is a considerable reduction. However, the risk in a depot cannot be completely zero either, because the sculptures still underlie a climatic effect, albeit to a lesser extent. Also, some risk factors such as low ultrasound velocity remain, even if there will probably be no further deterioration in a depot.

      Overall results show that the Risk Number is an appropriate tool to all owners who wish to examine their sculpture stock and determine the risk of endangerment. Although the Risk Number does not give specific instructions about what measures are required, a high number indicates the main risks. It is therefore a useful tool in the discussion about necessary conservation measures.

       Acknowledgements

      The author is indebted with great thanks to Prof. Dr. Rainer Drewello (University of Bamberg), Dipl. Rest. Carolin Pfeuffer (Europäisches Zentrum für Steinmetz