Writing the TV Drama Series 3rd edition. Pamela Douglas

Читать онлайн.
Название Writing the TV Drama Series 3rd edition
Автор произведения Pamela Douglas
Жанр Кинематограф, театр
Серия
Издательство Кинематограф, театр
Год выпуска 0
isbn 9781615931088



Скачать книгу

      PD: Any final words of wisdom for a beginning writer?

      JW: It’s going to take a lot longer than you think, and don’t give up. Just keep writing.

      There was a guy I went to USC with who I used to see every year at a New Year’s party. And every year I’d ask him what he was doing. He told me what he was working on, and I realized it was the same thing he was working on last year. That went on for three or four years. You need to be writing, at the minimum three or four specs a year, different shows. And you need to do that while you’ve got whatever day job you have to keep you alive. That’s the sort of commitment you need to really succeed.

      Even my friends who came out of school and immediately got jobs or sold screenplays — within three or four years they ended up having to do their period of four or five or six years slogging. I really don’t know any talented writers who ended up being successful who haven’t had a struggle. That’s just what being an artist is all about.

image

       WHAT’S SO SPECIAL ABOUT TV DRAMA SERIES?

       Imagine the power.

      Picture the whole world dotted with hundreds of millions of screens glowing with the light from television images. Inside each TV set, computer monitor, and mobile screen — your own, for example — visitors tell stories about their dreams and problems, loves and rages, their thrills and their losses. You care about them, probably more than you admit, and even talk about them when they’re not around — after all, they come as often as you invite them.

      Sometimes they’re broiling over issues in the news. Or sick and scared about that, or lying, or brave. At one time they were attacked and fought back and barely survived. But no matter what, they’ll be back next time, your same friends, there with you in your most vulnerable places, at home after work and on weekends, on your phone while you wait alone for a plane, on your computer when you can’t sleep at night. Intimate.

      Maybe one of them is Tony Soprano, the mob boss, asking Uncle Junior, “I thought you loved me,” and watching Junior’s lip quiver, unable to answer. Or Mad Men’s Don Draper hurrying home for Thanksgiving with his family after all, imagining them happy, only to discover they’re already gone. In The Good Wife pilot, you were reeled into the fraction of a second when Alicia, standing by her philandering husband, fixes on a bit of string on his jacket, as if removing it would put her life back in order. On House, you were drawn into a doctor’s moral quandary when he must choose between allowing the tyrant in his care to perpetrate genocide or killing his patient. On Treme, just months after hurricane Katrina, amidst destroyed homes and near-empty streets, you rooted for Chief dressing in his Mardi Gras costume of immense yellow feathers, dancing and singing with enough heart to bring back the dead and New Orleans. Joy and tears, up close and personal.

      Think about the impact. Once you understand the way viewers relate to their favorite shows, you’ll get a feel for the kinds of stories that work and how to wield this awesome power.

      Among the traits that distinguish primetime series (both dramas and comedies) from other kinds of screenwriting, three are especially significant for writers: endless character arcs, the “long narrative” for serials, and the collaborative process.

      In feature writing you were probably told to create an arc for your protagonist that takes him from one state to its opposite; the character struggles toward a goal, and once that is attained, your story ends. Someone who is unable to love is changed when a mate/child/friend appears and, through fighting the relationship, the character is finally able to love. Or someone who has been wronged seeks revenge and either achieves it or dies for the cause. All fine for movies that end. But series don’t.

      So how do you progress a narrative without an arc? Well, you create a different kind of arc. Remember what I said about series characters being more like people you know than figures in a plot. If your friend has an extreme experience, you continue knowing him after the event. You’re invested in the process, not just the outcome.

      But watch out — this does not mean the characters are flat. Your continuing cast should never be mere witnesses to the challenge of the week. On the contrary, characters who are not transformed by the plot need something instead: dimension. Think of it like this: instead of developing horizontally toward a goal, the character develops vertically, exploring internal conflicts that create tension. The character may be revealed incrementally within each episode and throughout the series, but viewers need to trust that Alicia Florrick and Walter White are the same people they knew last week. Does that mean those characters are without range or variation? Of course not, and neither are your friends.

      Episodic drama comes in three forms: anthologies, series with “closure,” and “serials.”

      Most series have some closure, even if they continue other storylines. But when a series is well developed, the writers and fans follow the characters and find it hard to resist their history as it inevitably builds over time. In its early seasons, The X-Files had a new alien or paranormal event each week, and though the romantic tension between Mulder and Scully simmered, it didn’t escalate. Then interest from viewers pushed more and more of a relationship and turned the partners into lovers by the end of the series. Most X-Files episodes can still be enjoyed in any order, but serial storytelling is beguiling.

      Today, the best shows that close each episode also have ongoing dramatic stories. House and The Good Wife, for example, have built followings on their continuing characters. But from a writing point of view, they are constructed as procedurals (more about that term later).

      Current heirs to soapy melodrama flourish in teen relationship shows, on the CW network especially. In the future, the inheritance may well be the Internet, where inexpensive, quickly-produced fare without known stars or elaborate production values can be made by anyone with a digital camera and editing software. And those episodes can run throughout the day and night.

      Meanwhile, what about