Your Literacy Standards Companion, Grades 9-12. Jim Burke

Knowledge of Language3. Apply knowledge of language to understand how language functionsVocabulary Acquisition and Use4. Determine or clarify the meaning of unknown . . . words and phrases5. Demonstrate understanding of figurative language, word relationships . . . nuances6. Acquire and use . . . general academic and domain-specific words and phrases

      10 ResourcesResource A. Common Core Recommended Reading ListsResource B. Text Complexity ToolResource C. Planning Calendar Templates

      11  About the Author

      Introduction: Turning Standards Into Daily Teaching

       People can’t live with change if there’s not a changeless core inside them. The key to the ability to change is a changeless sense of who you are, what you are about, and what you value.

      —Stephen Covey

      Moving Forward—Together

      An excellent education should not be an accident; it should be a right, though nowhere in the U.S. Constitution or any of our other founding documents do we find that right listed. Across the nation, state academic standards address that omission and challenge us all—administrators and teachers, parents and children, politicians and the public at large, professors and student teachers—to commit ourselves anew to the success of our children and our country.

      In my nearly 25 years in education, I have been involved with many efforts to develop standards. I have had the honor of sitting alongside some of our country’s greatest educational innovators and leaders to help develop the College Board’s Pre-AP English Language Arts Framework, the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards for Adolescent Literacy, the National Council of Teachers of English Language Arts Standards, the framework for the Advanced Placement English Literature and Composition, the California Standards for English Language Arts, and, to the extent that such books serve as a form of literacy standards, the Holt McDougal 6–12 language arts textbooks. But the standards movement today is different: it comes with a level of support, a degree of commitment from leaders at all levels of government and business, and a sense of urgency that the other efforts could not or cannot claim.

      There is a sense that we are all at some crucial inflection point in our national story, one that provides an opportunity we must not squander if our children are to help make this story we are trying to write about our country come true. I am often struck, listening to my mother-in-law, who has lived with us for many years, by her description of the country during the Depression and World War II, both of which she endured while living in the house she now shares with us. Almost any story she tells conveys a sense of shared commitment to the good of the community and country, that vital sense of mission that everyone was in it together, even—or especially—when the work was difficult and demanded some sacrifice.

      It is not just the country and students that stand to benefit from the new commitment to standards, but teachers, too, for as Calkins, Ehrenworth, and Lehman (2012) argue, teaching to standards can “deepen the reading skills of adults as well.” It is this same sense of mutual benefit that Carol Jago (2005) calls to mind in her allusion to the old U.S. Navy watchword of “one hand for the ship, one hand for yourself” (p. 101), because everything I have done to better understand and implement the standards has only made me more aware of my teaching, and improved it, by making it more “intentional [and challenging me to] establish an environment conducive for learning by setting objectives, reinforcing effort, and providing recognition” (Kendall, 2011, p. 28).

      Arthur Applebee (2013), in writing more specifically about the Common Core State Standards, offered a detailed analysis that illustrates and confirms “that aligning our teaching [to standards] does not mean we need to abandon all that we have learned about effective curriculum and instruction.” Applebee spends much of this journal article analyzing lessons from my own class, which I described in What’s the Big Idea? Question-Driven Units to Motivate Reading, Writing, and Thinking (Burke, 2010). In his analysis, Applebee notes the following:

      Burke’s lessons are quite overtly aligned to standards. Rather than teaching to the tests, these lessons focus on engaging students in cognitively and linguistically challenging tasks in the course of which they will gain the knowledge and skills that the standards require.

      Units with the richness and imagination of those that Burke describes in What’s the Big Idea? reflect a coming together of the wisdom of practice with the best of current research and theory on the teaching of English language arts. Such teaching does not offer the simple prescriptions that guide classrooms that focus curriculum and instruction more directly on the standards and the tests that accompany them. But the paradox is that by not teaching to the test, students in classrooms like Burke’s will do better on tests in general, and at the same time develop the knowledge and skills to do well in other contexts of schooling, life and work. And schools will be much more interesting places to be, for teachers and students alike. (p. 33)

      A Brief Orientation to Your Literacy Standards Companion, Grades 9–12

      One cannot benefit from or use a standards document that demands more time than a teacher or administrator has each day; thus, I seek here to share with you, my fellow educators, these indispensable resources: concise translations of the standards I currently use in my classroom in California, the Common Core standards, along with detailed correlation indexes showing readers in key non–Common Core states exactly which pages of this book have relevant information for them. I created this book in part for myself, to make my job easier as I plan my lessons every evening, write my books, or prepare the workshops I give around the country.

      What I offer you here is a compass of sorts to help you—whether you are an administrator or teacher, department chair or district curriculum supervisor, a professor, or a student teacher training to join us in this richly rewarding enterprise called education—understand and make better use of your standards. Here you will find several features I have designed and refined with the help of many teachers, curriculum supervisors, and superintendents with whom I have met and worked around the country in recent years. Because California has adopted the Common Core standards, these standards are naturally the basis for my plan. Still, I think you’ll find the features, in combination with the correlation indexes at the front of this book, will provide you with a working compass to navigate your own state standards.

      Additional key features, each developed with you in mind, include the following:

      A one-page overview of all the Common Core anchor standards. The anchor standards form the spine that holds the K–12 ELA standards together. The anchor standards encompass each aspect of English Language Arts: reading, writing, speaking and listening, and language. Beginning in kindergarten and running through grade 12, each grade-specific standard builds incrementally to college and career readiness. If you are in a non–Common Core state, your state standards will be different in specifics, but their purpose and organization are similar. Designed for quick reference, this one-page document offers all users an overview—a place where you can get the lay of the land, no matter what state you’re in or what grade you teach.

      Side-by-side anchor standards translation. How do anchor standards translate to the classroom? The anchor standards for each category—reading, writing, speaking and listening, and language—appear at the start of each section as a two-page spread with the original Common Core anchor standards on the left and, on the right, their matching translations in more accessible, classroom-friendly language. While the specifics of your standards may differ, you’ll undoubtedly find the real-world explications relevant and useful to your situation.

      A new user-friendly format for each standard. Instead of the four reading standard domains—literature, informational, social studies, and science and technical subjects—spread throughout