Название | Managing Diabetes and Hyperglycemia in the Hospital Setting |
---|---|
Автор произведения | Boris Draznin |
Жанр | Медицина |
Серия | |
Издательство | Медицина |
Год выпуска | 0 |
isbn | 9781580406574 |
Table 2.4—Drugs Often Used in the Hospital That Can Cause Hyperglycemia or Diabetes
Antibiotics
—Quinolones
Gantifloxicin (can also cause hypoglycemia)
Levofloxicin
Atypical antipsychotics
—Most risky
Clozapine
Olanzapine
—Intermediate
Paliperidone
Risperidone
β-Blockers (carvedilol not associated with hyperglycemia)
—Atenolol
—Metoprolol
—Propranolol
Calcineurin inhibitors
—Cyclosporin
—Sirolimus
—Tacrolimus
Corticosteroids
Diazoxide
Nicotinic Acid
Protease inhibitors
Thiazide and thiazide-like diuretics
Lipodystrophic Diabetes
Lipodystrophies are heterogeneous-heterogeneously acquired or inherited disorders characterized by selective loss of adipose tissue. These patients have severe insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and hepatic steatosis.35 Interestingly, insulin resistance but not hyperglycemia is the norm in those patients with lipodystrophy related to protease inhibitors. Conversely, congenital generalized lipodystrophy usually is associated with severe hypertriglyceridemia prone to pancreatitis.
Other Forms of Diabetes Often Seen in the Hospital
The etiology of the diabetes is multifactorial. As noted, other conditions are associated with diabetes, and one that often is seen in the hospital is diabetes associated with hepatitis C infection.36 These patients are at high risk for stress hyperglycemia or already may have undiagnosed T2D when admitted.
Conclusion
The classification of diabetes remains a work in progress. Attempts to classify our patients will lead to better understanding of the pathophysiology of the common diabetes types, the genetic mutations causing diabetes in rare forms of diabetes, and greater recognition of the vast heterogeneity in this disease. It is clear that for some patients, accurately classifying diabetes in the hospital may not be possible, whereas for others, more sophisticated lab testing may be required to confirm both diagnosis as well as classification. Occasional patients will be difficult to classify. Nevertheless, while in the hospital, the primary goal will remain to thoughtfully consider classification of diabetes and to treat the hyperglycemia to accepted targets, and this usually will require insulin therapy.
We acknowledge that the various subtypes of autoimmune diabetes have an evolving consensus in their classification. Figure 2.1 illustrates our conceptualization for how a health-care provider in the hospital can think about the classification of diabetes, taking into account what is now accepted by the ADA and what often is used clinically.
Figure 2.1—A conceptual classification for diabetes mellitus. Above the dark line are those classes not included in the 2015 ADA classification; below the line are those that are included. Moving left to right moves to greater degrees of insulin resistance.
*Depending on etiology, may have different degrees of insulin resistance and does not include CFRD; **wide degrees of insulin resistance depending on etiology.
References
1. Pihoker C, Gilliam LK, Ellard S, et al. Prevalence, characteristics, and clinical diagnosis of maturity onset diabetes of the young due to mutations in HNF1A, HNF4A, and glucokinase: results for the SEARCH for diabetes in youth. J Clin Metabol Endocrinol 2013;4055–4062
2. Thewitchcharoen Y, Wanothavaro E, Himathongkam T, et al. Permanent neonatal diabetes misdiagnosed as type 1 diabetes in a 28-year-old female: a life-changing event. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2014;106:e22–e24
3. Hardt PD, Brendel MD, Kloer HU, et al. Is pancreatic diabetes (type 3c diabetes) underdiagnosed and misdiagnosed? Diabetes Care 2008;31(Suppl. 2):S165–S169
4. Reinehr T, Schober E, Wiegand S, et al. β-cell autoantibodies in children with type 2 diabetes mellitus: subgroup or misclassification? Arch Dis Child 2006;91:473–477
5. American Diabetes Association. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care 2015;38(Suppl. 1):S8–S16
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2014 National diabetes statistics report. http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics/2014StatisticsReport.html. Accessed 20 January 2015
7. Young K, Mustard CA. Undiagnosed diabetes: does it matter? CMAJ 2001;164:24–28
8. Kotagal M, Symons R, Hirsch IB, et al. Perioperative hyperglycemia and risk for adverse events among patients with and without diabetes. Ann Surg 2015;261:97–103
9. Levetan CS, Passaro M, Jablonski K, et al. Unrecognized diabetes among hospitalized patients. Diabetes Care 1998;21:246–249
10. Umpierrez GE, Isaacs SD, Bazargan N, et al. Hyperglycemia: an independent marker of in-hospital mortality in patients with undiagnosed diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002;87:978–982
11. Rubinow KB, Hirsch IB. Reexamining metrics for glucose control. JAMA 2011;305:1132–1133
12. Tarim O, Kucukerdgan A, Gunay U, et al. Effects of iron deficiency anemia on hemoglobin A1c I type 1 diabetes mellitus. Pediatr Inter 1999;41:357–362
13. Atkinson MA, Eisenbarth GS, Michels AW. Type 1 diabetes. Lancet 2014;383:69–82
14. Knip M, Siljander H. Autoimmune mechanisms in type 1 diabetes. Autoimmun Rev 2008;7:550–557
15. Davis AK, Dubose SN, Haller MJ, et al. Prevalence of detectable c-peptide according to age of diagnosis and duration of type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2015;38:476–481
16. Sun JK, Keenan HA, Cavallerano JD. Protection from retinopathy and other complications in patients with type 1 diabetes of extreme duration: the Joslin 50-year medalist study. Diabetes Care 2011;34:968–974
17. Miller KM, Foster NC, Beck RW, et al. Current state of type 1 diabetes treatment in the US: updated data from the T1D Exchange Clinic Registry. Diabetes Care 2015;38:971–978
18. Zimmet P, Tuomi T, Mackay IR, et al. Latent autoimmune diabetes of adults (LADA): the role of antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase in diagnosis and prediction of insulin dependency. Diab Med 1994;11:294–303
19. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. UK prospective diabetes study 16: overview of 6 years’ therapy of type II diabetes: a progressive disease. Diabetes 1995;44:1249–1258
20. DCCT Research Group. Effect of intensive therapy on residual beta-cell function in patients