Rasputin. Борис Романов

the State Duma ("What is it – stupidity or treason?"), In which he accused the Empress and Rasputin in a betrayal. According to some modern Russian historians, this Milukoff's speech marked the transition opposition offensive to forestall future charges in corruption and declare these future charges as "politically motivated." [28] [29] [30]. Since November 1916 Miliukoff and Gutchkov sharply stepped conspiracy against Nicholas II, which they have successfully implemented at the end of February 1917 (with a few generals who have previously been implicated by them in this conspiracy).

      Provisional Government. Lies and slander in "the freest country"

      (Based on the eponymous article by S. Fomin ("Russian Gazette" of 19 December 2003 http://www.rv.ru/content.php3?id=1402 ) and "The Encyclopedia of the Great Patriotic films." Agony»» (http://top-rufilms.info/p1-84.html ), with additions and comments of the author.) More details about all of this, you can read in my book [27].

      The first Provisional Government consisted mainly of the conspirators. Prince Lvov became Prime; Miliukov and Guchkov headed ministries . Naturally, winning the conspirators wanted to justify their coup and "playing card Rasputin" began to actively play out in the government media. It is also clear that this company was actively supported by all the leftist forces.

      Simultaneously, the Provisional Government accused of betraying the motherland Rasputin and the Empress . They , as well as the deposed imperial government were also accused of corruption. However, these numerous accusations further found no documentary evidence – despite the fact that the Provisional Government has put a lot of effort to search for evidence. To search for evidence, at the beginning of March 1917 (immediately after the abdication of Nicholas II) was established National Extraordinary Investigation commission (NEIS) of Provisional Government.

      By the summer of 1917 the members of the committee NEIS stated that they do not find any of the offense under investigation – and when the chairman of the commission (Muraviev) tried to force them to change their minds , some of them resigned ( in particular, the famous prosecutor Rudnev ) . In 1917 , Kerensky was forced to admit that they " did not find elements of crime in any actions of Nicholas II and his wife." Same Kerensky confirmed to British Ambassador Buchanan. Also NEIS failed to show any corruption charges former tsarist ministers, the general manager and other senior officials , both civilian and military and naval authorities. [31, 32] .