Interventional Cardiology. Группа авторов

Dewey M, Teige F, Schnapauff D, et al. Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenoses with multislice computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Intern Med. 2006; 145(6):407–15.

      6 6 Garcia MJ, Lessick J, Hoffmann MH. Accuracy of 16‐row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. JAMA. 2006; 296(4):403–11.

      7 7 Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, et al. Non‐invasive coronary computed tomographic angiography for patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the Coronary Angiography by Computed Tomography with the Use of a Submillimeter resolution (CACTUS) trial. Eur Heart J. 2007; 28(24):3034–41.

      8 8 Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Schmitz BL, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. JAMA. 2005; 293(20):2471–8.

      9 9 Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F, et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64‐slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46(1):147–54.

      10 10 Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64‐slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J. 2005; 26(15):1482–7.

      11 11 Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Krestin GP, et al. Improved diagnostic accuracy with 16‐row multi‐slice computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 45(1):128–32.

      12 12 Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Nieman K, et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43(12):2265–70.

      13 13 Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA, et al. High‐resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation. 2005; 112(15):2318–23.

      14 14 Nikolaou K, Knez A, Rist C, et al. Accuracy of 64‐MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 187(1):111–7.

      15 15 Nikolaou K, Saam T, Rist C, et al. [Pre‐ and postsurgical diagnostics with dual‐source computed tomography in cardiac surgery]. Radiologe. 2007; 47(4):310–8.

      16 16 Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Runza G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of non‐invasive 64‐slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol. 2006; 16(3):575–82.

      17 17 Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64‐slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46(3):552–7.

      18 18 Ropers D, Rixe J, Anders K, et al. Usefulness of multidetector row spiral computed tomography with 64‐ x 0.6‐mm collimation and 330‐ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol. 2006; 97(3):343–8.

      19 19 Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A, t al. Accuracy of dual‐source CT coronary angiography: First experience in a high pre‐test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol. 2006; 16(12):2739–47.

      20 20 Weustink AC, Meijboom WB, Mollet NR, et al. Reliable high‐speed coronary computed tomography in symptomatic patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 50(8):786–94.

      21 21 Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64‐multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 52(21):1724–32.

      22 22 Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64‐slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 52(25):2135–44.

      23 23 Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64‐row CT. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359(22):2324–36.

      24 24 Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, et al. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48(7):1475–97.

      25 25 Van Mieghem CA, Thury A, Meijboom WB, et al. Detection and characterization of coronary bifurcation lesions with 64‐slice computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Heart J. 2007; 28(16):1968–76.

      26 26 Wolny R, Pregowski J, Kruk M, t al. Computed tomography angiography versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary interventions in bifurcation lesions ‐ A prospective randomized pilot study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017; 11(2):119–28.

      27 27 Lee SH, Lee JM, Song YB, et al. Prediction of side branch occlusions in percutaneous coronary interventions by coronary computed tomography: the CT bifurcation score as a novel tool for predicting intraprocedural side branch occlusion. EuroIntervention. 2019; 15(9):e788–e95.

      28 28 Dai T, Wang JR, Hu PF. Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography in the detection of coronary artery in‐stent restenosis: evidence from an updated meta‐analysis. Eur Radiol. 2018; 28(4):1373–82.

      29 29 Van Mieghem CA, Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography for the evaluation of stent patency after left main coronary artery stenting: a comparison with conventional coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Circulation. 2006; 114(7):645–53.

      30 30 Smith SC, Jr., Feldman TE, Hirshfeld JW, Jr., et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention‐Summary Article: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47(1):216–35.

      31 31 Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM, et al. ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2010; 4(6):407.e1–33.

      32 32 Opolski MP, Achenbach S. CT Angiography for Revascularization of CTO: Crossing the Borders of Diagnosis and Treatment. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015; 8(7):846–58.

      33 33 Jungmann F, Emrich T, Mildenberger P, et al. Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography (MD‐CTA) of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts ‐ Update 2017. ROFO. 2018; 190(3):237–49.

      34 34 Collet C, Onuma Y, Andreini D, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography for heart team decision‐making in multivessel coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 2018; 39(41):3689–98.

      35 35 Maffei E, Seitun S, Guaricci AI, Cademartiri F. Chest pain: coronary CT in the ER. Br J Radiol. 2016; 89(1061):20150954.

      36 36 Hoffmann U, Bamberg F, Chae CU, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography for early triage of patients with acute chest pain: the ROMICAT (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Tomography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 53(18):1642–50.

      37 37 Hamilton‐Craig C, Fifoot A, Hansen M, et al. Diagnostic performance and cost of CT angiography versus stress ECG‐‐a randomized prospective study of suspected acute coronary syndrome chest pain in the emergency department (CT‐COMPARE). Int J Cardiol. 2014; 177(3):867–73.

      38 38 Litt HI, Gatsonis C, Snyder B, et al. CT angiography for safe discharge of patients with