Management of Complications in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Группа авторов

Читать онлайн.
Название Management of Complications in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Автор произведения Группа авторов
Жанр Медицина
Серия
Издательство Медицина
Год выпуска 0
isbn 9781119710738



Скачать книгу

will often present with complaints of a dull and deep pain, swelling and erythema of overlying tissues, paresthesia of the IAN, trismus, lymphadenopathy, fistula, fever, and malaise [38, 39]. In patients with chronic osteomyelitis, signs of acute infection such as fever are often not present; however, fistulas, both intra‐ and extraorally, are more common. Radiographs typically demonstrate a “moth‐eaten” appearance or the presence of radio‐opaque bony sequestra. CT scanning can assist in the demarcation of lesion extent, although it should be noted that 30–50% demineralization of bone is necessary before radiographic changes [38] (Figure 2.9). In chronic osteomyelitis, there may be radiopacity due to an osteitis‐type reaction and proliferation of bone. Laboratory workup will demonstrate a leukocytosis in acute forms, and elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C‐reactive protein (CRP) levels. Further laboratory evaluation of ESR and CRP levels during treatment can assist in assessment of resolution of the disease process. Culture specimens will often yield bacteria traditionally responsible for odontogenic infections, such as Bacteroides, Peptostreptococcus, Fusobacterium, and Streptococcus species. Occasionally, less common odontogenic bacteria are present, including Lactobacillus, Eubacterium, Klebsiella, Acinetobacter, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Osteomyelitis of the jaws is different from osteomyelitis of other bones in that staphylococci are usually not the predominant bacteria [38].

Photo depicts 3D reconstruction of right mandibular osteomyelitis demonstrating a “moth-eaten” appearance to the bone.

       Instrument Breakage/Foreign Body Displacement

       Etiology: excessive force, inappropriate instrument use

       Management: immediate or delayed removal of foreign body, monitoring

      The complexity of instruments utilized by the surgeon during third molar surgery can vary significantly based upon individual training, experience, and preferences. Nearly every surgeon has a preferred instrument for each situation, and, in many instances, the reliability and resiliency of those instruments may be taken for granted.

      The structural failure of an instrument can lead to complications associated with foreign body displacement into the maxillary sinus, infratemporal fossa, sublingual space, airway, gastrointestinal tract, etc. One well‐documented, and avoidable, complication is local anesthetic needle breakage, usually occurring during an IAN block. In most instances, the clinician has bent the needle at the hub in order to allow for an easier approach to the medial aspect of the ascending ramus and mandibular foramen to ensure an adequate local anesthetic injection [42].

      When instrument breakage does occur, the key is to locate the fractured portion of the instrument and assure that it is not violating, or could potentially violate, any surrounding critical structures (e.g., nerves, blood vessels). Once the location is ascertained, the surgeon should decide between two options: (i) leave the fractured piece in place and monitor for any migration or (ii) decide upon removal of the fractured instrument immediately or in a delayed fashion after fibrosis occurs.

Image described by caption.

Schematic illustration of a flow diagram depicting Fractured Instrument/Foreign Body.

      Despite the fact that there are many possible risks and