Populist Seduction in Latin America. Carlos de la Torre

on>

      

      Populist Seduction in Latin America

      This series of publications on Africa, Latin America, Southeast Asia, and Global and Comparative Studies is designed to present significant research, translation, and opinion to area specialists and to a wide community of persons interested in world affairs. The editor seeks manuscripts of quality on any subject and can usually make a decision regarding publication within three months of receipt of the original work. Production methods generally permit a work to appear within one year of acceptance. The editor works closely with authors to produce a high-quality book. The series appears in a paperback format and is distributed worldwide. For more information, contact the executive editor at Ohio University Press, 19 Circle Drive, The Ridges, Athens, Ohio 45701.

      Executive editor: Gillian Berchowitz

      AREA CONSULTANTS

      Africa: Diane M. Ciekawy

      Latin America: Brad Jokisch, Patrick Barr-Melej, and Rafael Obregon

      Southeast Asia: William H. Frederick

      The Ohio University Research in International Studies series is published for the Center for International Studies by Ohio University Press. The views expressed in individual volumes are those of the authors and should not be considered to represent the policies or beliefs of the Center for International Studies, Ohio University Press, or Ohio University.

      Populist Seduction in Latin America

       Second Edition

      Carlos de la Torre

      Ohio University Research in International Studies

       Latin America Series No. 50

       Ohio University Press

       Athens

      © 2010 by the

      Center for International Studies

      Ohio University

      All rights reserved

      To obtain permission to quote, reprint, or otherwise reproduce or distribute material from Ohio University Press publications, please contact our rights and permissions department at [phone] or [phone] (fax).

      www.ohioswallow.com

      First edition published as Populist Seduction in Latin America: The Ecuadorian Experience by Ohio University Press. ©2000 by the Center for International Studies, Ohio University

      Printed in the United States of America

      The books in the Ohio University Research in International Studies Series are printed on acid-free paper f ™

      18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 5 4 3 2 1

       Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication

      Torre, Carlos de la.

      Populist seduction in Latin America / Carlos de la Torre. — 2nd ed.

      p. cm. — (Ohio university research in international studies, latin america series; No. 50)

      Includes bibliographical references and index.

      ISBN 978-0-89680-279-7 (pb : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-0-89680-474-6 (electronic)

      1. Populism—Ecuador—History—20th century. 2. Ecuador—Politics and government—20th century.3. Velasco Ibarra, José María, 1893–1979. 4. Bucaram Ortiz, Abdalá, 1952–5. Populism—Latin America—History—20th century. 6. Political culture—Ecuador. 7. Political culture—Latin America. I. Title.

      JL3081.T672010

      320.9866—dc22

      2010000620

      Contents

       Preface to the Second Edition

       Preface to the First Edition

       Abbreviations

       Chapter 1 The Ambiguity of Latin American “Classical” Populism

       Chapter 2 Velasquista Seduction

       Chapter 3 Leader of the Poor or Repugnant Other?

       Abdalá Bucaram’s Populism

       Chapter 4 The Continuing Populist Temptation

       Chapter 5 The Resurgence of Radical Populism in Latin America

       Chapter 6 Rafael Correa

       Between Radical Populism and a Citizens’ Revolution

       Conclusion Between Authoritarianism and Democracy

       Notes

       References

       Index

      Preface to the Second Edition

      Since the publication of Populist Seduction in Latin America in 2000 there has been a renaissance of scholarship on populism.¹ The term has also traveled from academia to the media and policy circuits. Populism currently is used to describe the left-wing and nationalist governments of Hugo Chávez, Rafael Correa, and Evo Morales, which claim their legitimacy through winning elections, but which also follow certain authoritarian practices. Critics have charged these regimes with not respecting the separation of powers, the rule of law, the rights of the opposition, or the independence of the media. Critics also claim that their ultranationalist and statist economic policies cannot last and are viable only because of the current high prices of mineral resources. In these rentier states, for example, oil accounts for 75 percent of Venezuela’s exports and for 64 percent of Ecuador’s; in Bolivia natural gas accounts for 52 percent of all exports (Weyland 2009, 151). Contrary to these pessimistic and sobering assessments, Chávez, Correa, and Morales claim to be leading post-neoliberal regimes that have enhanced rights and that are experimenting with new forms of democratic politics. Their supporters consider these regimes as creative experiments of hope that can show to the left in the West the possibility for novel post-neoliberal social and economic policies. These experiments, they argue, can rejuvenate and reinvigorate democracy.

      These contradictory assessments about the state of democracy in Latin America, and about its relationship with populism, are based on how the word democracy has been understood through three democratizing traditions. The first is the liberal-republican democratic tradition, with its emphasis on individual freedoms, pluralism, procedural politics, accountability, and institutional designs aimed at maintaining checks and balances between the different branches of government. The second tradition, rooted in Marxism, emphasizes social justice and has advocated direct forms of democratic representation and participation in pyramidal citizen councils where delegates can be recalled (Held 1987, 105–39). Populism represents the third democratizing tradition. Populist leaders have constructed politics as an ethical and moral confrontation between the people and