High-Performance Materials from Bio-based Feedstocks. Группа авторов

activated carbon being 85% microporous and the alginate materials predominantly mesoporous (66–93%), albeit with some microporosity developing at higher temperatures.

Adsorption capacities are given in Table 3.5. It can be seen that all four adsorbates are taken up by all of the adsorbents without dramatic differences in capacity. Adsorption of the four molecules followed second‐order kinetics, and it appeared that surface area was an important factor, and that diffusion limitations were important in systems with high microporosity.

Where the Starbons really shine is in their ability to desorb the adsorbed materials. While activated carbon adsorbs all four materials well, it does not desorb them – the highest desorption in aqueous systems was for indole acetic acid, and that was as low as 1.2% of the total adsorbed. For the Starbons, the situation is much more variable, but up to 46% release was observed. This perhaps indicates that for the essentially microporous activated carbons, once desorption has taken place, desorption out of the micropores is extremely difficult, whereas, for the mixed micro‐/mesoporous systems, there may be a proportion of the material adsorbed in larger, more open pores where diffusion (out) is easier. Alternatively, it may be that the micropores are shallower and ‘decorate’ the walls of the mesopores in the case of Starbons, but in activated carbons, the pores are longer and thus retain material better. Whatever the reason, the Starbon materials offer excellent potential for adsorption and release of key bioactive molecules.

Table 3.5 Adsorption capacities for various alginic‐acid‐derived Starbons and an activated carbon.

      Source: Data from Shannon et al. [39].

Bioactive	Adsorption capacity (mg g−1)
AC	A300	A500	A800
Gibberelic acid (A)	72	98	76	118
Indole‐acetic acid (B)	210	115	150	157
Kinetin (C)	205	120	125	121
Abietic acid (D)	314	282	239	370

      3.2.5 Conclusion

      What this chapter has attempted to show is that highly functional and functioning advanced materials can be produced relatively simply from biomass residues, utilising the inherent functionality and structural properties of the polysaccharide materials. This aids in the important aim of transforming our mindset as a society from a linear economy model (extract – make – use – discard) to a more circular structure, where the discarded elements are treated as a resource to be valorised rather than to be disposed of. Such models are crucial if we are to attain a sustainable society which can support the needs of all of us.

      Due to the conversion of the ‘waste’ polysaccharides into a range of tunable high‐surface area, highly mesoporous materials can now be carried out at scale and the understanding of the processes has developed rapidly over the last few years, such that these materials have moved from the lab to production and commercialisation. This chapter has focused on two major areas of activity: adsorption and catalysis. We describe the various adsorption/desorption processes at which the materials excel, partly due to their relatively large pore size (with respect to the more traditional activated carbons) which allows them to effectively adsorb (and desorb) relatively large molecules, which are excluded from micropores. The tunable surface functionality also plays a significant role here, with the evolution of the surface being controlled by thermal treatments. However, it is not only small molecules that are adsorbed in impressive amounts – a wide range of acidic and basic gases are also taken up by the material, including ammonia, sulphur dioxide, hydrogen sulphide, and carbon dioxide, making these materials capable of air purification as well as water treatment.

      The catalytic aspects of the materials have also been explored, and in this part of the review, a range of surface functionalisation methodologies are presented. Again, these rely on the various surface functionalities for their success (e.g. bromination of unsaturated functionality to provide anchor points for further functionalisation, attachment of activating groups via hydroxyl functionalities and sulphonation to generate strongly acidic sites) and complex structures can be built up on the surface of the materials, again aided by large enough pores to allow ingress and egress of relatively bulky substrates.

      For purposes of space, the chapter does not include the development of nanoparticulate metal – Starbon composites, readily carried out, generally without the need for an additional reductant, making the process particularly green. Such materials have proved their use as catalysts, and related metal oxide nanoparticle – Starbon systems have recently been shown to be highly performing in battery applications. Similarly, the functionalisation of the materials with elements such as nitrogen is in its very early stages, with promising initial results presented here. However, much remains to be done to develop, control, and understand these materials, and to make the most of the perturbation that the nitrogen centres provide to the material.

References

      1 1. Sing, K.S.W., Everett, D.H., Haul, R.A.W. et al. (1985). Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity. Pure and Applied Chemistry 57: 603–619.

      2 2. Thommes, M., Kaneiko, K., Neimark, A.V. et al. (2015). Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure and Applied Chemistry 87: 1051–1061.

      3 3. Morris, S.M., Fulvio, P.F., and Jaroniec, M. (2008). Ordered mesoporous alumina‐supported metal oxides. Journal of the American Chemical Society 45: 15210–15216.

      4 4. Zhao, R.‐H., Li, C.P., Guo, F., and Chen, J.‐F. (2007). Scale‐up preparation of organized mesoporous alumina in a rotating packed bed. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 46: 3317–3320.

      5 5. Lee, J., Yoon, S., Oh, S. et al. (2000). Development of a new mesoporous carbon using an HMS aluminosilicate template. Advanced Materials 12: 359–362.

      6 6. Ryoo, R., Joo, S.H., and Jun, S. (1999). Synthesis of highly ordered carbon molecular sieves via template‐mediated structural transformation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 103: 7743–7746.

      7 7. Liu, A.H. and Schüth, F. (2006). Nanocasting: a versatile strategy for creating nanostructured porous materials. Advanced Materials 18: 793–1805.

      8 8. Jiang, T., Budarin, V.L., Shuttleworth, P. et al. (2015). Green preparation of tuneable carbon–silica composite materials from wastes. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 3: 14148–14156.

      9 9. Budarin, V., Clark, J.H., Hardy, J.J.E. et al. (2006). Starbons: new starch‐derived mesoporous carbonaceous materials with tunable properties. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 45: 3782–3786.

      10 10. White, R.J., Antonio, C.A., Budarin, V.L. et al. (2010a). Polysaccharide‐derived carbons for polar analyte separations. Advanced Functional Materials 20: 1834–1841.

      11 11. White, R.J., Budarin, V.L., and Clark, J.H. (2010b). Pectin‐derived porous materials. Chemistry