Materials for Biomedical Engineering. Mohamed N. Rahaman

stress is removed but the recovery is slow and the stress–strain curve can be linear or nonlinear. Materials such as synthetic and natural rubbers, and the natural material elastin undergo large deformations and when unloaded, they return to their original shape. In spite of this, their stress–strain curve is nonlinear.

      4.2.3 Mechanical Response of Materials

      Materials show a variety of mechanical response that is strongly dependent on their interatomic bonding and structure. Following perfectly elastic deformation, ceramics (including glasses and glass‐ceramics) typically fracture catastrophically in a brittle manner whereas metals (and their alloys) deform plastically prior to eventual failure. Unlike metals and ceramics, the mechanical response of polymers at a given temperature is strongly dependent on the time over which the stress is applied (or the rate at which the stress is increased). This time‐dependent mechanical response of polymers is called viscoelasticity. Although large changes in temperature are not relevant to the application of biomaterials, it should be noted that unlike metals and ceramics, the mechanical response of polymers is also highly sensitive to the temperature of testing.

      Elastic and Plastic Deformation

The measured stress–strain curves of solids show a variety of shapes but the schematic curve in Figure 4.2 can be used to illustrate the distinction between elastic and plastic deformation. For metals, perfectly elastic behavior (less than approximately 0.1% strain) is followed by plastic deformation that can continue to much larger strains until the specimen fails, typically by breaking into two pieces. The strain at which the specimen fails, called the elongation to failure, can be in the range ~1% to over 50% for many metals. In comparison, ceramics fail within their elastic region, at strains less than ~0.1%, and the material fractures catastrophically into two or more pieces, a failure mode called brittle fracture. The ability to deform plastically is commonly referred to as ductility and, thus, metals are said to be ductile whereas ceramics are brittle.

Figure 4.2 Schematic stress–strain curve to illustrate the distinction between elastic and plastic deformation of materials.

      A key difference between elastic deformation and plastic deformation is that unlike elastic deformation, the strain or elongation due to plastic deformation is not recovered upon unloading the material. Upon loading a specimen from its unloaded dimension (point O in Figure 4.2) to point A in the elastic region, the specimen returns to its original dimension along the same line AO. Upon loading, atoms in the solid are displaced slightly from their equilibrium sites but do not take up new sites (Chapter 2). When the load is removed, the atoms return to their original equilibrium sites. In comparison, plastic deformation is irreversible. Upon loading a specimen to point B, the specimen follows the line BO′ upon unloading which is approximately parallel to AO. The small elastic portion of the strain is recovered but not the plastic portion. The atoms take up new sites relative to each other by movement of dislocations (Chapter 3). To summarize at this stage, the key features of elastic and plastic deformation are:

       Elastic deformationStrains commonly smallReversible: the material returns to its original unloaded dimensionAtoms are displaced slightly upon deformation but do not take up new sites

       Plastic deformationStains much larger than elastic deformationIrreversible: the plastic strain is not recovered upon unloadingAtoms take up new sites relative to each other

      Elastic Limit and Yield Point

The transition from elastic to plastic deformation is commonly called the yield point. Some stress–strain curves show a well‐recognized bump in this transition region which is taken as the yield point (Figure 4.3a). On the other hand, it is often difficult to locate the yield point in some stress–strain curves because they change gradually in this region (Figure 4.3b). When difficult to locate, the yield point is often taken at what is called an offset strain, equal to 0.2% strain. A straight line is drawn from the strain axis at 0.2%, parallel to the line for elastic deformation, and where this line crosses the stress–strain curve is taken as the yield stress.

Figure 4.3 Schematic diagrams to illustrate two types of plastic deformation and yield behavior of ductile materials.

      Definition and Determination of Strength

Various types of strength are used in the literature and, thus, it is useful to understand their definitions. As strength is determined from data obtained in various loading modes and is different in each loading mode, the specific type of strength should be stated when appropriate, such as tensile, compressive, shear, or flexural strength. In any loading mode, the strength is the highest stress that the material can support, sometimes referred to as the ultimate strength. The fracture strength (failure strength) is the stress at which the material fractures into two or more pieces. In tension or compression, strength is determined by taking the measured load and dividing it by the appropriate cross‐sectional area of the specimen. In torsion, the measured torque and specimen radius at failure along with Eqs. (4.8) and (4.9) are used, whereas in flexure, the measured load and the initial dimensions of the beam‐shaped specimen are substituted in Eq. (4.11) or Eq. (4.13). Commonly, several nominally identical specimens are tested and the strength is expressed as an average value plus or minus its standard deviation.

      For ductile materials, such as metals, an important type of strength is the tensile yield strength, that is, the tensile stress at the yield point. Another type of strength that is often used is the tensile strength, sometimes called the ultimate tensile strength. Depending on the nature of the stress–strain curve, the tensile strength can be equal to or different from the fracture strength, that is, the strength at failure (Figure 4.3). If the fracture strength is the highest stress in the curve, for example, the tensile strength and the fracture strength are the same.

      True Stress and Strain Versus Engineering (Nominal) Stress and Strain

      Specimens of ductile metals can show a significant decrease in their cross‐sectional area during tensile testing due to a large deformation in the ductile region. Consequently, for these specimens, stress can be defined in two ways:

       True stress σ, the load divided by the instantaneous cross‐sectional area of the specimen which compensates for the reduction in area

       Engineering stress σn, sometimes called nominal stress, the load divided by the initial cross sectional area of the specimen which does not compensate for a change in the area.

      Similar