Manual de goniometría. Cynthia C. Norkin

      Mínimo cambio detectable

      BIBLIOGRAFÍA

      1. Rothstein, JM y Echternach, JL: Primer on Measurement: An Introductory Guide to Measurement Issues. American Physical Therapy Association, Alexandria, VA, 1993.

      2. APTA: Guide to Physical Therapist Practice 3.0. Alexandria, VA, American Physical Therapy Association, 2014. Disponible en [http://guide topractice.apta.org].

      3. Portney, LG y Watkins, MP: Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice, 3.^a ed. FA Davis, Filadelfia, PA, 2015.

      4. Sim, J y Arnell, P: Measurement validity in physical therapy research. Phys Ther 73:102, 1993.

      5. Gajdosik, RL y Bohannon, RW: Clinical measurement of range of motion: Review of goniometry emphasizing reliability and validity. Phys Ther 67:1867, 1987.

      6. Piriyaprasarth, P y Morris ME: Psychometric properties of measurement tools for quantifying knee joint position and movement: A systematic review. Knee 14:2, 2007.

      7. Milani, P, et al: Mobile smartphone applications for body position measurement in rehabilitation: A review of goniometric tools. PM&R 6: 1038, 2014.

      8. Gogia, PP, et al: Reliability and validity of goniometric measurements at the knee. Phys Ther 67:192, 1987.

      9. Enwemeka, CS: Radiographic verification of knee goniometry. Scand J Rehabil Med 18:47, 1986.

      10. Ahlback, SO y Lindahl, O: Sagittal mobility of the hip-joint. Acta Orthop Scand 34:310, 1964.

      11. Kato, M, et al: The accuracy of goniometric measurements of proximal interphalangeal joints in fresh cadavers: Comparison between methods of measurement, types of goniometers, and fingers. J Hand Ther 20:12, 2007.

      12. Chen, J, et al: Meta-analysis of normative cervical motion. Spine 24:1571, 1999.

      13. Herrmann, DB: Validity study of head and neck flexion-extension motion comparing measurements of a pendulum goniometer and roentgenograms. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 11:414, 1990.

      14. Ordway, NR, et al: Cervical sagittal range-of-motion analysis using three methods: Cervical range-of-motion device, space, and radiography. Spine 22:501, 1997.

      15. Tousignant, M, et al: Criterion validity of the cervical range of motion (CROM) goniometer for cervical flexion and extension. Spine 25:324, 2000.

      16. Tousignant, M, et al: Criterion validity of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device for rotational range of motion on healthy adults. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 35:242, 2006.

      17. Macrae, JF y Wright, V: Measurement of back movement. Ann Rheum Dis 28:584, 1969.

      18. Portek, I, et al: Correlation between radiographic and clinical measurement of lumbar spine movement. Br J Rheumatol 22:197, 1983.

      19. Burdett, RG, Brown, KE y Fall, MP: Reliability and validity of four instruments for measuring lumbar spine and pelvic positions. Phys Ther 66:677, 1986.

      20. Mayer, TG, et al: Use of noninvasive techniques for quantification of spinal range-of-motion in normal subjects and chronic low-back dysfunction patients. Spine 9:588, 1984.

      21. Saur, PM, et al: Lumbar range of motion: Reliability and validity of the inclinometer technique in the clinical measurement of trunk flexibility. Spine 21:1332, 1996.

      22. Samo, DG, et al: Validity of three lumbar sagittal motion measurement methods: Surface inclinometers compared with radiographs. J Occup Environ Med 39:209, 1997.

      23. Vasen, AP, et al: Functional range of motion of the elbow. J Hand Surg Br 20A:288, 1995.

      24. Cooper, JE, et al: Elbow joint restriction: Effect on functional upper limb motion during performance of three feeding activities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74:805, 1993.

      25. Nelson, DL: Functional wrist motion. Hand Clin 13:83, 1997.

      26. Hermann, KM y Reese, CS: Relationships among selected measures of impairment, functional limitation, and disability in patients with cervical spine disorder. Phys Ther 81:903, 2001.

      27. Triffitt, PD: The relationship between motion of the shoulder and the stated ability to perform activities of daily living. J Bone Joint Surg 80:41, 1998.

      28. Wagner, MB, et al: Assessment of hand function in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74:801, 1993.

      29. Waddell, G, et al: Objective clinical evaluation of physical impairment in chronic low back pain. Spine 17:617, 1992.

      30. World Health Organization: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). World Health Organization, Ginebra, 2001.

      31. Scalzitti, DA: Examination of Function. En: O’Sullivan, SB, Schmitz, TJ y Fulk, GD (eds): Physical Rehabilitation, 6.^a ed. FA Davis, Filadelfia, 2014.

      32. Moore, ML: Clinical Assessment of Joint Motion. En: Basmajian, JV (ed): Therapeutic Exercise, 3.^a ed. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1978.

      33. Miller, PJ: Assessment of Joint Motion. En: Rothstein, JM (ed): Measurement in Physical Therapy. Churchill Livingstone, Nueva York, 1985.

      34. Lea, RD y Gerhardt, JJ: Current concepts review: Range-of-motion measurements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:784, 1995.

      35. Williams, MA, et al: A systematic review of reliability and validity studies of methods for measuring active and passive cervical range of motion. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 33:138, 2010.

      36. Van de Pol, R, et al: Inter-rater reliability for measurement of passive physiological range of motion of upper extremity joints is better if instruments are used: A systematic review. J Physiother 56:7, 2010.

      37. Van Trijffel E, et al: Inter-rater reliability for measurement of passive physiological movements in lower extremity joints is generally low: A systematic review. J Physiother 56:223, 2010.

      38. Grohmann, JE: Comparison of two methods of goniometry. Phys Ther 63:922, 1983.

      39. Hamilton, GF y Lachenbruch, PA: Reliability of goniometers in assessing finger joint angle. Phys Ther 49:465, 1969.

      40. Boone, DC, et al: Reliability of goniometric measurements. Phys Ther 58:1355, 1978.

      41. Pandya, S, et al: Reliability of goniometric measurements in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Phys Ther 65:1339, 1985.

      42. Bovens, AM, et al: Variability and reliability of joint measurements. Am J Sport Med 18:58, 1990.

      43. Hellebrandt, FA, Duvall, EN y Moore, ML: The measurement of joint motion. Part III: Reliability of goniometry. Phys Ther Rev 29:302, 1949.

      44. Low, JL: The reliability of joint measurement. Physiotherapy 62:227, 1976.

      45. Greene, BL y Wolf, SL: Upper extremity joint movement: Comparison of two measurement devices. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 70:299, 1989.

      46. Tucci, SM, et al: Cervical motion assessment: A new, simple and accurate method. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 67:225, 1986.

      47. Youdas, JW, Carey, JR y Garrett, TR: Reliability of measurements of cervical spine range of motion: Comparison of three methods. Phys Ther 71:2, 1991.

      48. Fitzgerald, GK, et al: Objective assessment with establishment of normal values for lumbar spine range of motion. Phys Ther