Frederick Douglass in Brooklyn. Frederick Douglass

ection>

      

       Table of Contents

      ___________________

       Note from Brooklyn Borough President Eric L. Adams

       Introduction

      Chapter 1: Self-Made Men Williamsburgh, with Walt Whitman, January 1859

      Chapter 2: The Black Man and the War Bridge Street AME, February 1863

      Chapter 3: What Shall Be Done with the Negro? Brooklyn Academy of Music, May 1863

      Chapter 4: Emancipation Jubilee Bedford-Stuyvesant, August 1865

      Chapter 5: The Assassination and Its Lessons Brooklyn Academy of Music, January 1866

      Chapter 6: Sources of Danger to the Republic Plymouth Church, December 1866

      Chapter 7: John Brown’s Heroic Character Clinton Street Baptist Church, May 1886

      Chapter 8: Lincoln’s Godlike Nature Crown Heights, February 1893

       Postscript

       Endnotes

       Acknowledgments

       About Frederick Douglass

       About Theodore Hamm

       Copyright & Credits

       About Akashic Books

       For Toni and Ellis

      Frederick Douglass, a man born in bondage and committed to the freedom of his people, arrived in Brooklyn to share a message of equality at institutions we know today, such as Bridge Street African Methodist Episcopal Church in Bedford-Stuyvesant and Plymouth Church in Brooklyn Heights. His descriptions of the evils of slavery resounded in the ears of listeners, and his speeches inspired their work as abolitionists. We continue to honor his legacy with three Frederick Douglass Academy schools in Brooklyn. It is my hope that this book will introduce Mr. Douglass to a generation that could benefit from the example of his clarity of purpose and moral vision, as well as his relationship to the Borough of Brooklyn.

       —Brooklyn Borough President Eric L. Adams

      Introduction

       Mr. Douglass has been in the habit of carrying his audiences by storm. His peculiar wit, sarcasm, drollery, dramatic intensity, and, more than all, his noble moral earnestness, set in strong relief by an indefinable and touching sadness of tone and mien, [are] apparent [in] all his speeches. Though he makes his listeners alternately cheer, laugh, and weep, they inevitably carry away with them, as the chief impression of the evening, not the ornament or side-play, but the logical frame-work and solid sense of the discourse. Frederick Douglass, beginning his life as a bond-slave, will leave behind him an honest fame as one of the chief orators of his day and generation.

      —Brooklyn’s Theodore Tilton, Independent,

       February 12, 1863

      Upon Frederick Douglass’s death in 1895, the New York Tribune—a newspaper founded by a leading abolitionist, Horace Greeley—dug up a chestnut from a half-century earlier. In 1846, Douglass had delivered a speech at a temperance gathering in London’s Covent Garden Theatre. There he told an audience that included both British royalty and US ministers that while temperance was indeed a worthy cause, the abolition of slavery was more important. After Douglass’s address, the Tribune said, among those who sought to congratulate the speaker was an “eminent Brooklyn divine.” Never one to mince words, Douglass rejected the overture. He told the minister, “Sir, were we to have met under similar circumstances in Brooklyn, you would never have ventured to take my hand, and you shall not do it here.”[1]

      Beyond illustrating Douglass’s resolute character, the anecdote also yields insight into Brooklyn’s race relations in the decades before the Civil War. Despite the presence of prominent white abolitionists, as well as that of vocal African Americans, Brooklyn was far from a haven of black equality. In the wake of the London meeting, Douglass engaged in a high-profile war of words in print with Reverend Samuel Hanson Cox, the prominent pastor of Brooklyn’s First Presbyterian Church. Though an abolitionist, Cox was outraged that Douglass had raised the issue of slavery at the temperance convention. In the New York Evangelist, a Presbyterian weekly newspaper, Cox called Douglass’s actions a “perversion” of the meeting’s intent and “abominable!” In William Lloyd Garrison’s Liberator, an influential abolitionist paper from Boston, Douglass labeled Cox a “sham” opponent of slavery. Audiences across the Northeast thus became aware of Brooklyn’s contested racial terrain.[2]

      Frederick Douglass never lived in Brooklyn, but his visits to the “City of Churches” stirred both enthusiasm and controversy. During the Civil War era many of his key friends and allies—including Henry Ward Beecher, Theodore Tilton, Lewis Tappan, James and Elizabeth Gloucester, James McCune Smith, and William J. Wilson (a.k.a. “Ethiop”)—called Brooklyn home. Douglass had close ties to three publications with Brooklyn roots: the Ram’s Horn (1847–1849), the Anglo-African (1859–1865), and the Independent (1860s). Meanwhile, his own publications, the North Star and Frederick Douglass’ Paper, featured regular Brooklyn correspondents, most notably Ethiop. Douglass was a close friend of John Brown, and the pages of the Anglo-African noted the former’s stop in Brooklyn—at the home of Elizabeth Gloucester—en route to a pivotal Harpers Ferry planning meeting in late August 1859. Theodore Tilton, who rose to prominence in his defense of Brown in the Independent, would become one of Douglass’s closest confidants during the Civil War and Reconstruction.

      Both in person and print, Douglass was a powerful presence in Brooklyn—and the varied reactions to his positions on abolition and black equality thus illustrate the ways in which those issues shaped the city in its formative decades. At African American churches like Reverend James N. Gloucester’s Siloam Presbyterian or James Morris Williams’s Bridge Street AME, or at white abolitionist strongholds like Henry Ward Beecher’s Plymouth Church, the gifted orator received a hero’s welcome. But in the pages of the Brooklyn Daily Eagle, a conservative Democratic organ during the Civil War, Douglass was often subjected to racist ridicule. Douglass had garnered a more friendly reception from Walt Whitman, during the latter’s short stints as editor of both the Eagle and the Brooklyn Daily Times. Even so, Whitman’s position on racial issues—antislavery but not proequality—reflected a notable current of local sentiment. Like New York City, Brooklyn (its own city until 1898)