Practicing Piety in Medieval Ashkenaz. Elisheva Baumgarten

with a menstruant) are featured prominently among the misdeeds that required harsher forms of repentance. Transgressions such as desecrating the Sabbath, gossip, and murder also demanded more severe expressions of contrition.¹⁶⁵

      In his analysis, Marcus highlights substantive differences between the systems set forth by Judah and Eleazar of Worms.¹⁶⁶ One distinguishing feature of Judah’s system is what Marcus describes as its sectarian nature, which required initiation for membership in his circle of Ashkenazic pietists.¹⁶⁷ In contrast, Marcus stresses the personal nature of Eleazar’s mode of instruction for pious atonement, channeled through self-perfection rather than a group experience.¹⁶⁸ One of the most explicit modifications is the apparent elimination of the Sage (hakham) in the role of confessor, which was introduced in Judah’s system but absent from the writings of Eleazar. Instead, admission of sin was transferred to the realm of private prayer and the determination of appropriate punishment was similarly assigned to the individual. Rather than mentioning a sage or guide, Eleazar produced a manual on repentance for individuals to consult.¹⁶⁹ Despite these distinctions, Eleazar maintains the primacy of fasting as an act of atonement.

      Let us now survey the circumstances in which these rabbis advised that fasts be undertaken. In Sefer Hasidim, Judah recommends fasting in numerous contexts: fasts associated with communal observances and in memory of beloved family members on the anniversaries of their deaths are mentioned alongside fasts by parents of sick children and single individuals in search of a marriage partner.¹⁷⁰ He advises fasting regularly to safeguard an appropriate posture of piety and humility toward God.¹⁷¹ He further explains that fasting is effective precisely because it “breaks the body.”¹⁷²

      Judah also mentions other situations that merit fasting. Not all are directly related to repentance, although most probably included a penitential aspect. For instance, “One who witnesses an eclipse—of the moon, for example—must fast. After all, he would fast after a bad dream and this is for the sake of the whole world.”¹⁷³ Here, fasting is intended to ward off punishment since eclipses were thought to result from sin.¹⁷⁴ Although the practice of fasting is rarely critiqued in Sefer Hasidim, the motives for fasts are questioned. For instance, in discussions of parents fasting for the sake of their children: “Witness how many fasts, [expressions of] self-denial,¹⁷⁵ cries and pleas a parent performs when his son falls ill, because of concern for his son’s body. Surely he should do at least as much if [his son] sins, for the soul’s well-being is eternal.”¹⁷⁶ Here neither fasts nor self-denial are being scrutinized, but rather their underlying motives if these practices were performed for the sake of physical welfare rather than spiritual elevation.

      In Sefer Hasidim, rituals for repentance after committing a grave sin involved not only fasting but also harsh corporal punishment, such as sitting in freezing water in the winter or on hornets’ or ants’ nests in the summer, or burning oneself with red-hot irons,¹⁷⁷ per the case of an adulterer: “If he inquires about how to repent … in the winter and [the river is frozen], he should break through the ice and sit in the water up to his mouth or nose for the same span of time from when he first addressed the woman until the sin’s completion.”¹⁷⁸ The inclusion of self-inflicted suffering in is an inherent element of the philosophy of Judah the Pious that has textual roots in the interpretation of Adam’s repentance in Tractate Eruvin (above).¹⁷⁹

      Eleazar of Worms details physical repentance rituals for many specific sins, such as murder:

      [In the case of] one who struck his companion—man, woman or child—and thus took his life, [the offender] should be exiled for three years. He should be flagellated and declare: “I am a murderer” in every city he visits. He should refrain from eating meat and drinking wine, from shaving his beard and the hair on his head, from laundering his clothes and washing his body. Washing his beard once a month is permitted. He should attach the hand that dealt the lethal blow to a chain looped around his neck.¹⁸⁰ He should go barefoot and mourn his victim, fasting daily until his period of exile is complete. He should then fast on Mondays and Thursdays for an additional year, even though he will already have fasted every day for three years. He should not do evil to any man. Should he be called a murderer, he should not argue. Rather, he should remain silent. Throughout those three years, he should not laugh (rejoice). When he leaves synagogue each day, he should lie down before the entryway; [all who exit] should step over him, never stepping on him. He should honor his wife and all persons and confess daily.¹⁸¹

      And the case of a Jew who informed on another Jew to Christian authorities:

      [In the case of] one who informs (malshin): one who informs against a neighbor, [thus] setting governmental officials against him … (the sinner) should pay (the victim) all (losses incurred as a result of his) action, he should also become his permanent servant, publicly ask forgiveness, be flagellated and confess as though [the informer] had killed all (of his neighbor’s) sons, daughters and (other) dependents.¹⁸²

      Anyone who followed these instructions was inevitably exposed before the entire community. While such severe modes of repentance were related to extreme transgressions, in the communal perception of repentance they shared many features with normative fasts.

      As Marcus has shown, Eleazar of Worms often heightened the severity of the penitential requirements set forth by Judah. To name one representative example, whereas Judah prescribed a three-day fast to any Jewish man who had sexual relations with a Christian woman or maidservant, Eleazar required flagellation, refraining from bathing, and fasting for at least forty days.¹⁸³ These physical forms of repentance became very popular.¹⁸⁴

      Marcus has argued that in Judah’s generation, these penitential rituals were only intended for a discrete circle of pietists. It appears that the effect of these rituals was substantially greater than has typically been assumed. I would claim that Judah and his disciple Eleazar of Worms were successful precisely because they were promoting fasting and repentance in an environment known for its predisposition toward these rituals.

      Ashkenazic liturgy also attests to the crucial place of fasting in medieval culture and the interpretation of fasting as the quintessence of teshuvah. As in other religions, the triad of charity, prayer, and fasting was viewed as the most efficacious path to salvation. In medieval Ashkenaz, this belief was most prominently conveyed in Netaneh Tokef, the piyyut that became a signature of the High Holiday prayers. This liturgical poem from late antiquity was part of a tale about Amnon of Mainz that was popularized in the late twelfth or early thirteenth century.¹⁸⁵ The apex of the poem, “and repentance and prayer and charity remove the evil decree” (uteshuvah utefillah utzedakah ma’avirin et ro’a hagezerah) offers guidance on becoming worthy of a positive inscription in the Book of Life. As some scholars have noted, this formula can be traced to a section in Midrash Bereshit Rabbah, a late antique midrash that was composed at approximately the same time as the Augustinian sermon (noted above), which asserts that fasting, charity, and prayer lead to salvation.¹⁸⁶

      Menahem Schmelzer has traced the versions of this most resonant line of Netaneh Tokef that have appeared over time, remarking that compilers of medieval mahzorim debated over the correct sequence of these three terms. Some objected to the conventional order that begins with teshuvah, since “prayer, charity, and repentance” is the sequence found in the midrash and in the Palestinian Talmud. Jacob Moellin (Maharil) defended the prevailing liturgical progression by explaining that true teshuvah, repentance that is integrated with prayer and charity, must necessarily follow fasting.¹⁸⁷ Some scribes copied not just these three terms, but their meanings as well: identifying teshuvah as fasting, tefillah as use of the voice, and tzedakah as money. These definitions were further supported by mathematical calculations using Jewish numerology (gematriah).¹⁸⁸

      Although the association of teshuvah with fasting (rather than with a broader definition of repentance) in commentaries on the High Holiday liturgy seems to have emerged in the late medieval period, it is based on fasting as a simile for teshuvah and as a consistent component of medieval repentance in sources such as the Crusade chronicles, Sefer Hasidim and Sefer Rokeah. Thus, despite the central role of Judah