Что такое глобальная история?. Себастьян Конрад

Press, 1970; Bharucha R. Another Asia: Rabindranath Tagore and Okakura Tenshin. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2006.

      54

      Моя интерпретация полемична по отношению к трактовке, предложенной в работе: Buruma I., Margalit A. Occidentalism: The West in the Eyes of Its Enemies. New York: Penguin Books, 2004.

      55

      Duara P. The Discourse of Civilization and Pan-Asianism // Journal of World History. 2001. № 12. P. 99–130; Sartori A. Bengal in Global Concept History: Culturalism in the Age of Capital. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2008.

      56

      Adas M. Contested Hegemony: The Great War and the Afro-Asian Assault on the Civilizing Mission Ideology // Journal of World History. 2004. № 15. P. 31–64; Sachsenmaier D. Searching for Alternatives to Western Modernity // Journal of Modern European History. 2006. № 4. P. 241–259.

      57

      Costello P. World Historians and Their Goals: Twentieth-Century Answers to Modernism. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press, 1993.

      58

      О дальнейшем см. замечательный очерк в работе: Sachsenmaier D. Global Perspectives. P. 25–58.

      59

      Единственный в своем роде (лат.).

      60

      McNeill W. The Rise of the West: A History of the Human Community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1963. Впоследствии Макнил дистанцировался от евроцентризма своего главного сочинения; см., например: McNeill W. World History and the Rise and the Fall of the West // Journal of World History. 1988. № 9. P. 215–236. Другие популярные работы в том же духе: Jones E. The European Miracle: Environments, Economies and Geopolitics in the History of Europe and Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981; Landes D. S. The Wealth and Poverty of Nations; Mitterauer M. Why Europe? The Medieval Origins of Its Special Path. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.

      61

      Sachsenmaier D. Global Perspectives. P. 184–191; Littrup L. World History with Chinese Characteristics // Culture and History. 1989. № 5. № 39–64.

      62

      Wallerstein I. The Modern World-System: In 4 vol. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1974–2011.

      63

      О США см.: Novick P. That Noble Dream: The «Objectivity Question» and the American Historical Profession. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

      64

      Berger M. T. Under Northern Eyes: Latin American Studies and US Hegemony in the Americas, 1898–1980. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1995; Harootunian H. D., Miyoshi M. (eds.). Learning Places: The Afterlives of Area Studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2002.

      65

      Young R. Postcolonialism: An Historical Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001.

      66

      Kay C. Latin American Theories of Development and Underdevelopment. London: Routledge, 1989.

      67

      Prakash G. Subaltern Studies as Postcolonial Criticism // American Historical Review. 1994. № 99. P. 1475–1490.

      68

      Sachsenmaier D. Global Perspectives. P. 45.

      69

      Haupt H.-G., Kocka J. (eds.). Comparative and Transnational History: Central European Approaches and New Perspectives. New York: Berghahn Books, 2009; Cohen D., O’Connor M. (eds.). Comparison and History. New York: Routledge, 2004.

      70

      См. недавнюю оценку компаративного метода: Steinmetz G. Comparative History and Its Critics: A Genealogy and a Possible Solution // Duara P., Murthy V., Sartori A. (eds.). A Companion to Global Historical Thought. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell, 2014. P. 412–436.

      71

      Особый путь (нем.).

      72

      Lieberman V. Strange Parallels: Southeast Asia in Global Context c. 800–1830. Vol. 1. Integration on the Mainland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

      73

      Werner M., Zimmermann B. Beyond Comparison: Histoire Croisée and the Challenge of Reflexivity; Espagne M. Sur les limites du comparatisme en histoire culturelle // Genèses: Sciences Sociales et Histoire. 1994. № 17. P. 112–121; Subrahmanyam S. Connected Histories: Notes toward a Reconfiguration of Early Modern Eurasia // Modern Asian Studies. 1997. № 31. P. 735–762; Subrahmanyam S. Explorations in Connected History: From the Tagus to the Ganges. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

      74

      Pomeranz K. The Great Divergence: Europe, China, and the Making of the Modern World Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000. P. 9.

      75

      Ibid. P. 297.

      76

      См. прекрасный образец такого глобального сравнения: Hill C.L. National History and the World of Nations; см. также мою оценку этой книги в главе 7.

      77

      Clavin P. Defining Transnationalism // Contemporary European History. 2005. № 14. P. 421–439; Budde G., Conrad S., Janz O. (eds.). Transnationale Geschichte: Themen, Tendenzen und Theorien. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2006; Saunier P.-Y. Transnational History. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.

      78

      Bender Th. A Nation among Nations: America’s Place in World History. New York: Hill and Wang, 2006. P. III, IX.

      79

      Bender Th. A Nation among Nations. P. 4.

      80

      Ibid. P. IX, 5.

      81

      См.: Bayly C. A. AHR Conversation: On Transnational History // American Historical Review. 2006. № 111. P. 1442.

      82

      Freitag U., Oppen A. V. (eds.). Translocality – The Study of Globalising Phenomena from