Khan. Almaz Braev

Khan

      Almaz Braev

      © Almaz Braev, 2024

      ISBN 978-5-0062-2333-2

      Создано в интеллектуальной издательской системе Ridero

      In September 2012, the remains of Richard III, the last of the Plantagenet dynasty, were accidentally discovered in Leicester. He was killed in battle by representatives of the Tudors, another royal branch of Britain. His enemies stripped him, even cut off his feet out of fear. The honorable burial took place three years after the examinations. In the same year, there was a sensation. The local club Leicester became the champion of England for the 2015—2016 seasons. This book is for those in power who held any position or worked in the apparatus.

      Many sectarians could say – present: «You complain about the dictatorship of those at the top»

      This is not the case.

      Yes, I am offering autocratic power. The power of the chosen and worthy. And the scoundrels of officials were recruited up because of the mainstream and liberal misconceptions. While clowns are appointed to rule countries all over the world.

      Through so-called democracy weeding out weak people to the top will only accelerate the deep state’s collapse. The collapse of traditional families, your relatives, your meaning of life.

      But I haven’t been interested in you for a long time. You only need a layout of a ready-made organization under the name of the state.

      Chapter 1

      When fathers are afraid of their sons

      No matter what nomads do, no matter how they dress, no matter what they are called, they remain nomads even in the most expensive European tailcoats.

      Nomads have never been either liberals or Democrats. The nomads had a specific democracy. Instead, this is an extraordinarily infrequent emergency with no real Khan.

      But when a real khan appears, the nomads live by an age-old ideology – the father is afraid of the son.

      The father is afraid of the son – this is the actual total ideology of the nomads, invisible to the outside eye. Khan is not scared of his entourage. He can execute them, send them to war, defame them, and make the people curse their names. Traitors can die either in battle or by accident.

      Khan’s son may also die by accident. For example, from a kulan attack on a hunt. Have you ever heard of hunters being killed by an artiodactyl attack while hunting? Especially if it’s the Khan’s son.

      The father is afraid of the son, which means the rulers fear the closest ones. So that they don’t come forward and don’t obscure

      the leader so that they don’t get cocky.

      For the people, this also means mutual responsibility. In Asia, there is total joint responsibility; there was, there is, and there will be. For now, fathers will be afraid of the audacity of their sons.

      Nomads have sons who are not daring from birth. That’s how they’re raised so they don’t disgrace their fathers.

      Officials are also brought up in the spirit of fear, no matter how they dress or what modern costumes they wear.

      So. That’s why fathers are afraid of their sons.

      Chapter 2

      The castes

      Under a democratic system, parents will not be respected and feared (all under the pretext of freedom!), the migrant will be equalized with the native citizen, and the citizen with the migrant; the same will happen with foreigners.

      Plato

      Autocracy, the Asian dictatorship, is quite a harmonious political system for former nomads.

      The quality of power under an autocracy is another matter. It depends on the personality of the autocrat. This is the Achilles heel of all monarchies. But this does not negate the fact that people have different degrees of suitability for other people’s systems, particularly for democracy.

      Conservative systems are fixated on castes. This is mainly due to the tradition of noble families. This implies that even despite education, ordinary people (the rabble) cannot think deeply, abstractly, or nobly. This very crowd, the self-esteem of the masses, and the ambitions of ordinary people are being used with the help of so-called democracy to the detriment of ordinary people themselves, traditional peoples. Of the most stupid, uneducated, and intemperate, they create a new «democratic elite» on the ground, But by the 21st century, approaches must be reconsidered. Moreover, the conditional rabble received carte blanche for the entire 20th century in the form of socialist ideas. Socialism and this is Chinese, North Korea, Vietnamese, and in the former USSR it took root in a strange way in ASIA, where there has always been a monarchy

      In the 21st century, these socialist monarchs are going through a crisis, or they are waiting for a crisis like the crisis in the USSR, where a new conservative elite of peasant children has matured and immediately organized their own dictatorship of the oligarchy.

      ===================================

      I give an example of the type of the former nomads for an accurate understanding that not all people are capable of high flight. First, socialism educated everyone; then, democracy unleashed the tongues of such people. Ordinary people usually give their voices in times of extreme need or disaster (famine, war, etc.). When there is no need, they cast their votes in vain.

      In this case, Islam came to the aid of the Arabs, the same nomads, and through the Koran, appealed to all people.

      This appeal does not require feedback, that is, it is as autocratic as the secular power of the nomads. There can be no other treatment.

      Communication with former nomads can only be autocratic, unconditional, and one-sided.

      This solves the issue of medieval castes if people lack their understanding.

      Chapter 3

      Degradation of power on a global scale

      «The lack of beauty standards due to which the majority of the world’s population has complexes.»

      The law of nature requires that the smart communicate with the smart and the stupid with the crowd. Democracy humiliates the smart in the name of the stupid because the silly will never choose the smart. This briefly explains the reasons for the degradation of the institution of power in recent centuries.

      Today, the situation is catastrophic. The pride of the crowd has penetrated all spheres. You ask, how can self-love penetrate into all spheres? Because the average non-ambitious, non-jealous people grew up just on this moderate choice of millions and (even billions nowadays) of their kind who do not cause jealousy and envy. And this choice is called democracy.

      Today, the crowd really decides where a genius or a smart guy would get into a dead end of contradictions. From here, horrid girls win the beauty contest, and the jury of experts doesn’t know who to give the Nobel Peace Prize to – Gretta Thunberg or Zelensky. Humanity is at the highest point of degradation. There has never been such a degradation of human values, logic, and reason in the history of mankind. There were only forerunners of such a degradation phenomenon (since the Athenian democracy).

      Chapter 4

      When humanity has no strategy

      «It’s hard to say which form of government is worse, and everyone is so bad. And a democratic one is the worst of all because what is democracy but an aristocracy of scoundrels.»

      George Gordon Byron

      The totality of the media has led people to become